Westjet's Group Rates

The GenStA Dresden, sitting defendant and the "respect"

"A court which is not based on submission, but on a human atmosphere, does not expect any honors. Even with the verdict, the defendant may remain seated. . The defendant is no longer the subject, on the swings, the Court of the Sword "
(Rudolf Wassermann, ZRP 1969, 169, 171)

But , the prosecutor Schreitter-Skvortsov said of the Prosecutor General's Office Dresden: Obviously, the GenStA Dresden is almost 30 years after the water's preoccupation with the theme of "permanent seat defendant" still does not step forward and says The defendant is the subject, on which the Court of the sword swings.

ignored in their opinion for immediate appeal against the fine on charges of "suspension" by the verdict, the prosecutor pretty much everything that was presented in the statement of grounds on the subject - precisely the kind of - arguments not observed - opinion as we in his time as a blog entry only way to sanction (without argument) to "defend", have shown. The GenStA is not even too good to recite the "argument" of "respect," which has just been exposed in the grounds of appeal as unfounded sense across pages and perfect.

before special Background of on 14.12.07, held the trial, a trial whose style the totalitarian corresponded systems and was not painted in the mixture rule of law, the GenStA is still one on top: "The story of the trial is not in any event, the seat stay while to justify the verdict. "

we formulate this once more clearly to make it clear what the GenStA here claimed officially If a court in a trial to the accused, the defense surprising and unlawful (this is now by the LG found been !) withdraws then does not allow any interruption and the accused in a kind of summary proceedings in a legal vacuum then convicted - all this does not alter the fact that the accused in the verdict this, pay is apparently not in law bound sentient court "respect" by rising - and if the accused does not, then it is only fair to require the defendants therefor a fine or, failing that, to imprison him for this behavior for two days.

That such a view can not be found in Berlin in 1935, Rostock Stuttgart in 1955 or 1975, but in Dresden 2008 - you have to cope with the first one ...

Westjet's Group Rates

The GenStA Dresden, sitting defendant and the "respect"

"A court which is not based on submission, but on a human atmosphere, does not expect any honors. Even with the verdict, the defendant may remain seated. . The defendant is no longer the subject, on the swings, the Court of the Sword "
(Rudolf Wassermann, ZRP 1969, 169, 171)

But , the prosecutor Schreitter-Skvortsov said of the Prosecutor General's Office Dresden: Obviously, the GenStA Dresden is almost 30 years after the water's preoccupation with the theme of "permanent seat defendant" still does not step forward and says The defendant is the subject, on which the Court of the sword swings.

ignored in their opinion for immediate appeal against the fine on charges of "suspension" by the verdict, the prosecutor pretty much everything that was presented in the statement of grounds on the subject - precisely the kind of - arguments not observed - opinion as we in his time as a blog entry only way to sanction (without argument) to "defend", have shown. The GenStA is not even too good to recite the "argument" of "respect," which has just been exposed in the grounds of appeal as unfounded sense across pages and perfect.

before special Background of on 14.12.07, held the trial, a trial whose style the totalitarian corresponded systems and was not painted in the mixture rule of law, the GenStA is still one on top: "The story of the trial is not in any event, the seat stay while to justify the verdict. "

we formulate this once more clearly to make it clear what the GenStA here claimed officially If a court in a trial to the accused, the defense surprising and unlawful (this is now by the LG found been !) withdraws then does not allow any interruption and the accused in a kind of summary proceedings in a legal vacuum then convicted - all this does not alter the fact that the accused in the verdict this, pay is apparently not in law bound sentient court "respect" by rising - and if the accused does not, then it is only fair to require the defendants therefor a fine or, failing that, to imprison him for this behavior for two days.

That such a view can not be found in Berlin in 1935, Rostock Stuttgart in 1955 or 1975, but in Dresden 2008 - you have to cope with the first one ...