Average Women Dress Size

Richter invents Unverzüglichkeitsanspruch if rejected outside the trial

Three and a half weeks had passed since we RIAG Ronsdorf at 01:06:09 on had pointed that the rejection letter against him by the still undecided 11:05:09 floated in space. On 06/25/2009 he decided finally this: the rejection of 11.05.09 - the cost of memory processes - is inadmissible as "late" (§ § 25 para 2 No 2, 26a para 1, No. 1 Code of Criminal Procedure). The problem: We are not in a trial, and therefore there is no legal requirement at all the "promptness", the norm is simply not applicable. call

such a decision "bold" is certainly exaggerated diplomacy. But we will first review the left to district court. The first time now has a chance, the College at Zittau AG to leave in a question and reject the case - to present to the LG Görlitz - and history to do so. appeal against the order, we have brought on 03.07.09, at the same time "backup" rejection from 01.06.09 (which brought only should had been, if Ronsdorf constantly refuse to decide the rejection of 11:05:09 at all anyway, and according to identical terms of the rejection of 11:05:09) was withdrawn .

By criminal proceedings against Jörg Dresden everything was timed just a little tight, so that we can - ultimately short, because clear - grounds of the appeal filed later have today. Now, under the LG Görlitz first evaluate the operations of last year ...

Average Women Dress Size

Richter invents Unverzüglichkeitsanspruch if rejected outside the trial

Three and a half weeks had passed since we RIAG Ronsdorf at 01:06:09 on had pointed that the rejection letter against him by the still undecided 11:05:09 floated in space. On 06/25/2009 he decided finally this: the rejection of 11.05.09 - the cost of memory processes - is inadmissible as "late" (§ § 25 para 2 No 2, 26a para 1, No. 1 Code of Criminal Procedure). The problem: We are not in a trial, and therefore there is no legal requirement at all the "promptness", the norm is simply not applicable. call

such a decision "bold" is certainly exaggerated diplomacy. But we will first review the left to district court. The first time now has a chance, the College at Zittau AG to leave in a question and reject the case - to present to the LG Görlitz - and history to do so. appeal against the order, we have brought on 03.07.09, at the same time "backup" rejection from 01.06.09 (which brought only should had been, if Ronsdorf constantly refuse to decide the rejection of 11:05:09 at all anyway, and according to identical terms of the rejection of 11:05:09) was withdrawn .

By criminal proceedings against Jörg Dresden everything was timed just a little tight, so that we can - ultimately short, because clear - grounds of the appeal filed later have today. Now, under the LG Görlitz first evaluate the operations of last year ...