Average Women Dress Size

Richter invents Unverzüglichkeitsanspruch if rejected outside the trial

Three and a half weeks had passed since we RIAG Ronsdorf at 01:06:09 on had pointed that the rejection letter against him by the still undecided 11:05:09 floated in space. On 06/25/2009 he decided finally this: the rejection of 11.05.09 - the cost of memory processes - is inadmissible as "late" (§ § 25 para 2 No 2, 26a para 1, No. 1 Code of Criminal Procedure). The problem: We are not in a trial, and therefore there is no legal requirement at all the "promptness", the norm is simply not applicable. call

such a decision "bold" is certainly exaggerated diplomacy. But we will first review the left to district court. The first time now has a chance, the College at Zittau AG to leave in a question and reject the case - to present to the LG Görlitz - and history to do so. appeal against the order, we have brought on 03.07.09, at the same time "backup" rejection from 01.06.09 (which brought only should had been, if Ronsdorf constantly refuse to decide the rejection of 11:05:09 at all anyway, and according to identical terms of the rejection of 11:05:09) was withdrawn .

By criminal proceedings against Jörg Dresden everything was timed just a little tight, so that we can - ultimately short, because clear - grounds of the appeal filed later have today. Now, under the LG Görlitz first evaluate the operations of last year ...

Average Women Dress Size

Richter invents Unverzüglichkeitsanspruch if rejected outside the trial

Three and a half weeks had passed since we RIAG Ronsdorf at 01:06:09 on had pointed that the rejection letter against him by the still undecided 11:05:09 floated in space. On 06/25/2009 he decided finally this: the rejection of 11.05.09 - the cost of memory processes - is inadmissible as "late" (§ § 25 para 2 No 2, 26a para 1, No. 1 Code of Criminal Procedure). The problem: We are not in a trial, and therefore there is no legal requirement at all the "promptness", the norm is simply not applicable. call

such a decision "bold" is certainly exaggerated diplomacy. But we will first review the left to district court. The first time now has a chance, the College at Zittau AG to leave in a question and reject the case - to present to the LG Görlitz - and history to do so. appeal against the order, we have brought on 03.07.09, at the same time "backup" rejection from 01.06.09 (which brought only should had been, if Ronsdorf constantly refuse to decide the rejection of 11:05:09 at all anyway, and according to identical terms of the rejection of 11:05:09) was withdrawn .

By criminal proceedings against Jörg Dresden everything was timed just a little tight, so that we can - ultimately short, because clear - grounds of the appeal filed later have today. Now, under the LG Görlitz first evaluate the operations of last year ...

Lobster Creels For Sale

Beginning Monday, sat: two days in jail for sitting and standing

"Even with the verdict should be allowed the victim to receive the blow in the club seats."
Rudolf Wassermann, 1969

SchnickSchnack said, RIAG Ronsdorf someday into Zittau, and the Dresden court of appeals concurred: The club meets much better if the victim is! And not only that, but full respect to the accused rise. And if the lack of respect, then this is just created, with punishment! As Ronsdorf was in December 2007 to be the rule of law and rule of law after a hearing conducted Zittau land rights, since there was some detectable by the Court itself produced a lack of "respect" the defendant. No, this was the end of a proceeding in which his most basic Rights were denied to "bring the matter before the judge" not even when he finally aburteilte him. He remained seated.

But he is now. As of Monday . For two days. In the prison Görlitz. And then? How, pray tell expected, for the enlightened democratic rule of law, Andreas comes out of prison? Purified? Respectful? Probably right on the way to court in order to apologize for his boorish behavior Ronsdorf?

Or maybe something distant relative to the judicial system which is also a half years later, even at the cost of legal "blind eye even" can and the accused tried 240 EUR to steal from the pocket ?

Anyway. "Sovereign Justice" would look well different. It remains for posterity to note because an otherwise so no one believes, was in 2009 in Germany, a man for two days, sent to prison because he is at his sentencing, refused to raise the pants for about 40 to cm from the chair. And an official objective of the whole action: respect!

let's hope that among the participating judges no parents trying to teach their children to such kind of "respect " ...