Baking A Cake Piano Shape

level insufficient: Case LG Görlitz is against total war objector before

a judge at the hearing and read his written opinion, can sometimes be two pairs of shoes. Although the presiding judge had the LG Görlitz, Böcker, before and during the trial made it clear that he likes a different style of criminal procedure, as his "predecessor" at AG Zittau, Ronsdorf. That an overall calm and relaxed negotiation is not the same as hiding itself behind Santander legal brilliance, like the now writing this sentence testifies all the more ...

start with, there is the question of why the blocking appointment of public prosecutor is not inadmissible has been discarded. For this purpose, Böcker noted, first, that the guidelines for criminal and administrative penalties have no binding effect - that this statement is an empty statement regarding the issues to be discussed, we had already discussed: for the inadmissibility of the appeal is not directly (only) the violation of RiStBV, but also from the fact that the appeal has been lodged vexatious. However, given the RiStBV (using very useful criteria) provides the framework in which the prosecution has to move - if the user leaves, is at least the suspicion of abuse of rights on the hand, in this case he could even be proved. But such fine distinctions which shears a judge who just "will not" ...

Then Böcker is almost funny: He controls but once again the respect of RiStBV (which he had just been declared irrelevant) and says: The RiStBV prohibit such an appeal only if it is because the other party has filed an appeal . But, the resourceful judges, here it was the other way around: The prosecution had indeed first appeal, filed! Were it not so bitter, you could almost smile about it. For if a process runs as in Zittau, without any binding to the Code of Criminal Procedure and detached from the spirit of law, then should it be clear that trying the accused will be here to take action, but then appeal, the prosecution only against the defendants appeal, and already she can say, 'We have done so not because of the appeal of the accused, but first, thus completely independent of the defendant! " Well, if the argument should take, so this might sound like the call to the public prosecutor the same, "first" fast appeal, and then the withdrawal from the conduct of the accused be made conditional. Since exactly this behavior - the Prosecutor operates an appeal depending on the appeal of the accused - but excluded by the wording in the RiStBV be is, the text must be interpreted accordingly: "The mere fact that another party has filed an appeal, is for the attorney constitute a sufficient reason to challenge the ruling also or a challenge to maintain ." But interpret what if the result does not settle with the will would bring to the judge in accordance ...

Finally, and here's getting really annoying, copied Böcker the excuse of the prosecutor, who said: 'We call instead so the two months three to six months, so muuuch more, and therefore, the appeal also permitted. " We now had the appropriate application set out across pages, first, that the reasons which called for the district attorney a fine sharpening, continuous not been legally recognized, and second, that the penalty amount to precisely according to the case not in a "manifest imbalance" claim the district attorney is. What the judge has to counter this? Nothing . But yes, he has the last word (and not the accused) has to stay there and even if the logic and arguments on the track - who's cares?

Then we come to really facts, since the so-called "flight services". Böcker summarizes the entering of Andreas together initially quite good, a few Paragraphs later apparently forgotten all of you: "The court is aware that it is completely absurd to see a job in a children's home as part of military service." had now spoken by "part of the military service" no, this is attributable only to the imagination of the judge, but by "part of the military service" - and that is regulated in § 3 para 1 sentence 1 Compulsory Military Service Act: "Conscription is met by the military service or ... by the civil service." But here it's just easy to invent something to say then that this was "completely absurd" - the accused can not even take corrective action ...

But besides that, enough of the mental horizon is not too far "Apparently, he can easily agree with his conscience but to suspend by a failure to treat these soldiers to significant risk." explained as a judge of a total objector, which every war involvement clearly now (in planning) and in the future (in war) preclude it by refusing to participate at about the Wounded supply of a soldier, these "significant risks" expose "significant risk" ! That the "significant risk" to life and health of entire populations of soldiers and war starts, and it just comes to fighting this threat, seems to be a presiding judge of the District Court to a difficult-to-minded thought. Important: you even need the opinion of the accused not to take for themselves, we may see even war as the most convenient form of passing the time - but understand the counter argument intellectually, this should already be in the situation before one strikes with the club of criminal law ! Legally, it is

short sleeves again, if justified, the judge "§ 53 ZDG is therefore compatible with the Basic Law." Has anyone ever said otherwise? No. The question whether a penal provision is constitutional, is an entirely other than that, if a punishment in individual cases if there is a conscience decision is unconstitutional. Now this is not just splitting hairs, but coarsest legal trade, which Böcker (and sorry to say: individual criminal court again and again) does not dominate. Especially, the configuration by decision of the Constitutional Court in the so-called " faith healer case " is a very simple example of this, of course, was there not state that the criminal standard of failing to assist is unconstitutional, but that the conviction under this constitutional standard itself can constitute unconstitutional if the criminal offense is based on a decision of conscience.

If Böcker says seen "that such total objectors have to answer very negative social consequences, because in this case, the children do without from the home of a caregiver" , he has unfortunately not even take note: The civil service has to be labor-market-neutral course the children have a right to be a caregiver to have, but still, they have a right to a trained caregiver to have, one that makes voluntary the job, and not a caregiver who is being forced under threat of punishment. Now here is as above: You have not see it. You can also refer to an anti-social point of view and say ask: 'have children no rights, and if they get a tutor, then please than forced labor. " Can make. Go. Not smart, but does. What is not is a thoroughly logical and coherent argument to not understand the approach, but to think that legally and morally judge the accused be allowed to. The rest of that paragraph

may not even be commented on. A judge, whose intelligence allows him obviously do not understand simple property relationships, which makes up but then the defendant a "strange world of thought" and he placed under "considerable maturity deficits" is certainly worthy of his office. Especially but such remarks are an insult and slap in the face of a defendant who all substantive arguments - and the bargain morality - on his side ...

Baking A Cake Piano Shape

level insufficient: Case LG Görlitz is against total war objector before

a judge at the hearing and read his written opinion, can sometimes be two pairs of shoes. Although the presiding judge had the LG Görlitz, Böcker, before and during the trial made it clear that he likes a different style of criminal procedure, as his "predecessor" at AG Zittau, Ronsdorf. That an overall calm and relaxed negotiation is not the same as hiding itself behind Santander legal brilliance, like the now writing this sentence testifies all the more ...

start with, there is the question of why the blocking appointment of public prosecutor is not inadmissible has been discarded. For this purpose, Böcker noted, first, that the guidelines for criminal and administrative penalties have no binding effect - that this statement is an empty statement regarding the issues to be discussed, we had already discussed: for the inadmissibility of the appeal is not directly (only) the violation of RiStBV, but also from the fact that the appeal has been lodged vexatious. However, given the RiStBV (using very useful criteria) provides the framework in which the prosecution has to move - if the user leaves, is at least the suspicion of abuse of rights on the hand, in this case he could even be proved. But such fine distinctions which shears a judge who just "will not" ...

Then Böcker is almost funny: He controls but once again the respect of RiStBV (which he had just been declared irrelevant) and says: The RiStBV prohibit such an appeal only if it is because the other party has filed an appeal . But, the resourceful judges, here it was the other way around: The prosecution had indeed first appeal, filed! Were it not so bitter, you could almost smile about it. For if a process runs as in Zittau, without any binding to the Code of Criminal Procedure and detached from the spirit of law, then should it be clear that trying the accused will be here to take action, but then appeal, the prosecution only against the defendants appeal, and already she can say, 'We have done so not because of the appeal of the accused, but first, thus completely independent of the defendant! " Well, if the argument should take, so this might sound like the call to the public prosecutor the same, "first" fast appeal, and then the withdrawal from the conduct of the accused be made conditional. Since exactly this behavior - the Prosecutor operates an appeal depending on the appeal of the accused - but excluded by the wording in the RiStBV be is, the text must be interpreted accordingly: "The mere fact that another party has filed an appeal, is for the attorney constitute a sufficient reason to challenge the ruling also or a challenge to maintain ." But interpret what if the result does not settle with the will would bring to the judge in accordance ...

Finally, and here's getting really annoying, copied Böcker the excuse of the prosecutor, who said: 'We call instead so the two months three to six months, so muuuch more, and therefore, the appeal also permitted. " We now had the appropriate application set out across pages, first, that the reasons which called for the district attorney a fine sharpening, continuous not been legally recognized, and second, that the penalty amount to precisely according to the case not in a "manifest imbalance" claim the district attorney is. What the judge has to counter this? Nothing . But yes, he has the last word (and not the accused) has to stay there and even if the logic and arguments on the track - who's cares?

Then we come to really facts, since the so-called "flight services". Böcker summarizes the entering of Andreas together initially quite good, a few Paragraphs later apparently forgotten all of you: "The court is aware that it is completely absurd to see a job in a children's home as part of military service." had now spoken by "part of the military service" no, this is attributable only to the imagination of the judge, but by "part of the military service" - and that is regulated in § 3 para 1 sentence 1 Compulsory Military Service Act: "Conscription is met by the military service or ... by the civil service." But here it's just easy to invent something to say then that this was "completely absurd" - the accused can not even take corrective action ...

But besides that, enough of the mental horizon is not too far "Apparently, he can easily agree with his conscience but to suspend by a failure to treat these soldiers to significant risk." explained as a judge of a total objector, which every war involvement clearly now (in planning) and in the future (in war) preclude it by refusing to participate at about the Wounded supply of a soldier, these "significant risks" expose "significant risk" ! That the "significant risk" to life and health of entire populations of soldiers and war starts, and it just comes to fighting this threat, seems to be a presiding judge of the District Court to a difficult-to-minded thought. Important: you even need the opinion of the accused not to take for themselves, we may see even war as the most convenient form of passing the time - but understand the counter argument intellectually, this should already be in the situation before one strikes with the club of criminal law ! Legally, it is

short sleeves again, if justified, the judge "§ 53 ZDG is therefore compatible with the Basic Law." Has anyone ever said otherwise? No. The question whether a penal provision is constitutional, is an entirely other than that, if a punishment in individual cases if there is a conscience decision is unconstitutional. Now this is not just splitting hairs, but coarsest legal trade, which Böcker (and sorry to say: individual criminal court again and again) does not dominate. Especially, the configuration by decision of the Constitutional Court in the so-called " faith healer case " is a very simple example of this, of course, was there not state that the criminal standard of failing to assist is unconstitutional, but that the conviction under this constitutional standard itself can constitute unconstitutional if the criminal offense is based on a decision of conscience.

If Böcker says seen "that such total objectors have to answer very negative social consequences, because in this case, the children do without from the home of a caregiver" , he has unfortunately not even take note: The civil service has to be labor-market-neutral course the children have a right to be a caregiver to have, but still, they have a right to a trained caregiver to have, one that makes voluntary the job, and not a caregiver who is being forced under threat of punishment. Now here is as above: You have not see it. You can also refer to an anti-social point of view and say ask: 'have children no rights, and if they get a tutor, then please than forced labor. " Can make. Go. Not smart, but does. What is not is a thoroughly logical and coherent argument to not understand the approach, but to think that legally and morally judge the accused be allowed to. The rest of that paragraph

may not even be commented on. A judge, whose intelligence allows him obviously do not understand simple property relationships, which makes up but then the defendant a "strange world of thought" and he placed under "considerable maturity deficits" is certainly worthy of his office. Especially but such remarks are an insult and slap in the face of a defendant who all substantive arguments - and the bargain morality - on his side ...

Examples Of Referrals Letter In Real Estate

filed an appeal against TKDV Rating of LG Görlitz

against the decision of the LG Görlitz, we first inserted revision. Whether the review will be conducted really depends, first and once on the written opinion based on LG Görlitz.

The most interesting is actually the question of whether the ruling can be challenged in the thrust that the appeal of the prosecution should have been inadmissible must be discarded. This must be balanced but if so whether this negative decision of the Court of Appeals Dresden is not the unpleasant variety.

plan in any case, we present the following additional activities:

• work-up of the process last December by the publication in political and legal policy journals (There are already concrete plans)


• publications in legal journals on the question of the possible inadmissibility of a Prosecution Appeals (here we are yet to Author search)

to all the issues we will publish more details when the time comes.

Examples Of Referrals Letter In Real Estate

filed an appeal against TKDV Rating of LG Görlitz

against the decision of the LG Görlitz, we first inserted revision. Whether the review will be conducted really depends, first and once on the written opinion based on LG Görlitz.

The most interesting is actually the question of whether the ruling can be challenged in the thrust that the appeal of the prosecution should have been inadmissible must be discarded. This must be balanced but if so whether this negative decision of the Court of Appeals Dresden is not the unpleasant variety.

plan in any case, we present the following additional activities:

• work-up of the process last December by the publication in political and legal policy journals (There are already concrete plans)


• publications in legal journals on the question of the possible inadmissibility of a Prosecution Appeals (here we are yet to Author search)

to all the issues we will publish more details when the time comes.

Joseph's Amazing Coat Outline Clipart

LG Görlitz sentenced total objectors to 60 daily rates - "I want not a legal break new ground "

The district court has the Görlitz total war objector Andreas Reuter (Zittau) to a fine of 60 daily (each 20, - EUR) convicted. Thus, it has initially rejected the content against total objectors on appeal the prosecution and the verdict of the AG Zittau (2 months' imprisonment) was amended slightly in favor of the accused. However, it has not rejected the appeal by the prosecution inadmissible as - what was the real target of the defense.

was to be seen, negotiations took place in a much calmer atmosphere than at the District Court of Zittau. Under the pressure of over 80 spectators - and without a martial police presence in Zittau - this time Andrew was read out his entering, in which he explained how the community service is integrated as a conscript in compliance with the plans for so-called "total defense".

said prosecutor Ebert that he could not understand what serve for the "concrete community service" that Andreas was supposed to stay was, finally, that "not recognizable" that "would have endorsed in 2005 the armed forces" Andreas . The prosecution had been to maintain their lock appeal - which they prevented the revision of the accused against the incredible events at the AG Zittau - officially targeted a higher penalty, Ebert now requested an amendment the appeal from two months suspended sentence on all 60 daily rates. This was followed by the prosecution of a revision of the defense argument, namely that a short prison sentence is inadmissible in cases such as this.

The defense then stated that the appeal be rejected as inadmissible the prosecution. In this clear case is not only a so-called "reverse appeals" in the know, the defense only or suspect that what was in the prosecution only to the prevention of the audit, but the prosecution has presented itself relevant evidence (such as the express refusal the appeal withdrawal by the Chief Public Prosecutor evil, though acknowledging that neither the prosecutor nor the appeal of his arguments revision argument of the defense even knowing). Following the request of the prosecutor in the trial following this no longer officially the goal of a higher punishment, so that they could be so far connected the revision of the accused - they do that but still not to the further revision argument of the defendant (the numerous procedural objections due supply of the behavior of judges Ronsdorf in Zittau) no judicial review.

also explained to the defense that regardless of this procedural Question, there is a conviction prohibits the context of the Basic Law postulated freedom of conscience. The question of the prosecutor to go after the "concrete action" failed in the civil service because it was not about the "concrete seals in the mud," to be brought against the grounds of conscience would need to be recognized as so-called conscientious objectors.

The court eventually followed the request of the prosecutor, and changed from the ruling of the district court in 60 day rates. Böcker judge was unable to appeal the prosecutor rejected as inadmissible, and the "Guidelines for the criminal and administrative penalties" for prosecutors were not bound, therefore the Court can not verify the "correctness" of the Berufungseinlegung, which is about as true as false - in principle the RiStBV are absolutely binding, be departed from (justified) individual cases of this but. The present case is, however, and it just had the defense been advised to appeal a legally improper, because the goal was solely to prevent the execution audit. The defense had also according to these principles, evidence presented in the case - only one case in which the appeal was rejected as inadmissible the prosecution, did not exist in this exact constellation. And so was

then probably the most honest statement in this method for the real reason here not to be engaging work: "I would not enter a new legal territory." , the presiding judge of the district court, Böcker. The times but is an argument ...

Joseph's Amazing Coat Outline Clipart

LG Görlitz sentenced total objectors to 60 daily rates - "I want not a legal break new ground "

The district court has the Görlitz total war objector Andreas Reuter (Zittau) to a fine of 60 daily (each 20, - EUR) convicted. Thus, it has initially rejected the content against total objectors on appeal the prosecution and the verdict of the AG Zittau (2 months' imprisonment) was amended slightly in favor of the accused. However, it has not rejected the appeal by the prosecution inadmissible as - what was the real target of the defense.

was to be seen, negotiations took place in a much calmer atmosphere than at the District Court of Zittau. Under the pressure of over 80 spectators - and without a martial police presence in Zittau - this time Andrew was read out his entering, in which he explained how the community service is integrated as a conscript in compliance with the plans for so-called "total defense".

said prosecutor Ebert that he could not understand what serve for the "concrete community service" that Andreas was supposed to stay was, finally, that "not recognizable" that "would have endorsed in 2005 the armed forces" Andreas . The prosecution had been to maintain their lock appeal - which they prevented the revision of the accused against the incredible events at the AG Zittau - officially targeted a higher penalty, Ebert now requested an amendment the appeal from two months suspended sentence on all 60 daily rates. This was followed by the prosecution of a revision of the defense argument, namely that a short prison sentence is inadmissible in cases such as this.

The defense then stated that the appeal be rejected as inadmissible the prosecution. In this clear case is not only a so-called "reverse appeals" in the know, the defense only or suspect that what was in the prosecution only to the prevention of the audit, but the prosecution has presented itself relevant evidence (such as the express refusal the appeal withdrawal by the Chief Public Prosecutor evil, though acknowledging that neither the prosecutor nor the appeal of his arguments revision argument of the defense even knowing). Following the request of the prosecutor in the trial following this no longer officially the goal of a higher punishment, so that they could be so far connected the revision of the accused - they do that but still not to the further revision argument of the defendant (the numerous procedural objections due supply of the behavior of judges Ronsdorf in Zittau) no judicial review.

also explained to the defense that regardless of this procedural Question, there is a conviction prohibits the context of the Basic Law postulated freedom of conscience. The question of the prosecutor to go after the "concrete action" failed in the civil service because it was not about the "concrete seals in the mud," to be brought against the grounds of conscience would need to be recognized as so-called conscientious objectors.

The court eventually followed the request of the prosecutor, and changed from the ruling of the district court in 60 day rates. Böcker judge was unable to appeal the prosecutor rejected as inadmissible, and the "Guidelines for the criminal and administrative penalties" for prosecutors were not bound, therefore the Court can not verify the "correctness" of the Berufungseinlegung, which is about as true as false - in principle the RiStBV are absolutely binding, be departed from (justified) individual cases of this but. The present case is, however, and it just had the defense been advised to appeal a legally improper, because the goal was solely to prevent the execution audit. The defense had also according to these principles, evidence presented in the case - only one case in which the appeal was rejected as inadmissible the prosecution, did not exist in this exact constellation. And so was

then probably the most honest statement in this method for the real reason here not to be engaging work: "I would not enter a new legal territory." , the presiding judge of the district court, Böcker. The times but is an argument ...

Green Aprazolam Jpee Real

appeal hearing against total objectors held

for Tuesday, 2 September 2008, at 10:00 clock scheduled appeal hearing at the District Court Görlitz (post number 18, room 200) to the total war objector Andreas Reuter will initially take place as planned.

was not yet decided on the request of the defense, the prosecutor's appeal be rejected as inadmissible, the prosecution was asked to comment on the application been, a prosecutor Küsgen had then applied for but only , "on the admissibility of the appeal to decide the verdict." comes to the presiding judge of the District Court, Böcker, now and after.

this respect, the trial two of the thematic strands have - firstly the question of whether the prosecution was ever justified in this case to appeal (or that this was not and only did it to a review of the incredible events at the District Court Zittau in the way to prevent the revision), on the other is of course up to a verdict and the criminal complaint - The "flight services" of the accused - to discuss his (or the reasons why Andrew has behaved like this, and the question of whether the state is in the light of the postulated in Article 4 paragraph 1 GG freedom of conscience in such a case may adopt criminal sanctions).

Green Aprazolam Jpee Real

appeal hearing against total objectors held

for Tuesday, 2 September 2008, at 10:00 clock scheduled appeal hearing at the District Court Görlitz (post number 18, room 200) to the total war objector Andreas Reuter will initially take place as planned.

was not yet decided on the request of the defense, the prosecutor's appeal be rejected as inadmissible, the prosecution was asked to comment on the application been, a prosecutor Küsgen had then applied for but only , "on the admissibility of the appeal to decide the verdict." comes to the presiding judge of the District Court, Böcker, now and after.

this respect, the trial two of the thematic strands have - firstly the question of whether the prosecution was ever justified in this case to appeal (or that this was not and only did it to a review of the incredible events at the District Court Zittau in the way to prevent the revision), on the other is of course up to a verdict and the criminal complaint - The "flight services" of the accused - to discuss his (or the reasons why Andrew has behaved like this, and the question of whether the state is in the light of the postulated in Article 4 paragraph 1 GG freedom of conscience in such a case may adopt criminal sanctions).

How To Wash Fuzzy Slippers

rejection of the appeal by the prosecution claims that the barrier illegal

The phenomenon of a "blocking call " by the prosecutor is unfortunately not completely unknown. In this way, trying to StA necessary to prevent by placing a call to perform a jump of law against a verdict (§ 335 para 3 Code of Criminal Procedure).

This type of appeal is regularly inadmissible, as measured primarily by the criteria of RiStBV No. 147, paragraph 1, sentence 4: "The mere fact that another party has filed an appeal, is for the attorney constitute a sufficient reason to challenge the verdict as well."

To such an appeal be rejected as inadmissible, has yet to be demonstrated that are advanced by the district attorney reasons for the appeal the professional level such: advanced. It may not "reasons" not legally be worth protecting, because otherwise the appointment would be acceptable in principle with the stated reasons (even if the accused "Knows" that the district attorney here would "really" do not have appealed, he would have brought no revision).

In this case, the situation is however quite clear. But at least the Chief OSTA Uebele explained who know Grounds for its competent authorities, prosecutor although not at all - will be withdrawn the appeal is not! Even mentioned by the district attorney reasons just not worth protecting legally - which are designated by the StA Aggravating circumstances continuously as such inadmissible. Finally, the lies from the district attorney officially targeted sanctions maybe not in a "manifest imbalance" to recognized punishment as required by the RiStBV but in Section 1 No. 147 p. 3.

Accordingly, we have now asked the District Court , the appointment of district attorney to § 322 Code of Criminal Procedure discarded.

How To Wash Fuzzy Slippers

rejection of the appeal by the prosecution claims that the barrier illegal

The phenomenon of a "blocking call " by the prosecutor is unfortunately not completely unknown. In this way, trying to StA necessary to prevent by placing a call to perform a jump of law against a verdict (§ 335 para 3 Code of Criminal Procedure).

This type of appeal is regularly inadmissible, as measured primarily by the criteria of RiStBV No. 147, paragraph 1, sentence 4: "The mere fact that another party has filed an appeal, is for the attorney constitute a sufficient reason to challenge the verdict as well."

To such an appeal be rejected as inadmissible, has yet to be demonstrated that are advanced by the district attorney reasons for the appeal the professional level such: advanced. It may not "reasons" not legally be worth protecting, because otherwise the appointment would be acceptable in principle with the stated reasons (even if the accused "Knows" that the district attorney here would "really" do not have appealed, he would have brought no revision).

In this case, the situation is however quite clear. But at least the Chief OSTA Uebele explained who know Grounds for its competent authorities, prosecutor although not at all - will be withdrawn the appeal is not! Even mentioned by the district attorney reasons just not worth protecting legally - which are designated by the StA Aggravating circumstances continuously as such inadmissible. Finally, the lies from the district attorney officially targeted sanctions maybe not in a "manifest imbalance" to recognized punishment as required by the RiStBV but in Section 1 No. 147 p. 3.

Accordingly, we have now asked the District Court , the appointment of district attorney to § 322 Code of Criminal Procedure discarded.

How Do You Insert File To Autocad

appeal hearing against total objectors in planning

Since neither State nor Justice Department Attorney General still could be induced to withdraw the revocation appeal against the decision of the AG Zittau, there is now some movement first reached on appeal. And it shows through, that the Chairman of the 5th Criminal Division at LG Görlitz, Böcker, here is another - operates the type of treatment process, as his "predecessor process," RIAG Ronsdorf - courteous, friendly, and ultimately more effective.

Example 1 - appointments: RIAG Ronsdorf had to our request listed on appointment (and also pays strict adherence to them ...), that he basically "in easy cases" by does any appointment, for, as Ronsdorf such would lead "to a de facto suspension of the administration of justice" . In fact, this led to two main burst hearings, unnecessary directions from witnesses and a processing delay of one year. VRiLG Böcker has now put to the vote the appointment. Should it come to appeal the trial, it will be at 02 September 2008, held at 10:00 clock (for details, see box at left - dates).

Example 2 - Access to the file: RIAG Ronsdorf had failed to supply the Act only on the local courts at the residence of the defenders for inspection. This led to various difficulties, because such assistance payable once the district court Königstein forgot to inform about this at all, but later was not an insight possible because Judges and judicial secretary in Königstein were negotiating. Later, finished consulting in Koenigstein, made it the justice secretary, from 10 to scan to copy pages from the wrong file 4 pages ... VRiLG Böcker us now the Act has sent directly to our respective application, which in turn contributed to a significant acceleration of the process. That the file was incomplete easily is not nice, now at a strength of over 470 sheets (!) And outstanding second and third acts is not necessarily a complete surprise ...

Example 3 - Zeuginnenabladung: RIAG Ronsdorf had had to load the trial dates in each case witnesses, the "flight services" by Andreas should confirm. To abandon our suggestion, this witnesses as the alleged external affairs was acknowledged Ronsdorf listed on the back of our letter: "No reason." VRiLG Böcker now that the witnesses had initially can be charged, responded to our corresponding excitation , this refrain, directly with the unloading the witnesses.

So it looks at least according to the present state of things as if the proceedings on LG Görlitz carried out with a professionalism that you actually by a court should always expect to, although the AG Zittau was missing completely. However: First, the question remains whether the (blocking) the prosecutor's appeal should be carried out at all, whether or not this is rejected as inadmissible. The request will be published tomorrow here ... .

How Do You Insert File To Autocad

appeal hearing against total objectors in planning

Since neither State nor Justice Department Attorney General still could be induced to withdraw the revocation appeal against the decision of the AG Zittau, there is now some movement first reached on appeal. And it shows through, that the Chairman of the 5th Criminal Division at LG Görlitz, Böcker, here is another - operates the type of treatment process, as his "predecessor process," RIAG Ronsdorf - courteous, friendly, and ultimately more effective.

Example 1 - appointments: RIAG Ronsdorf had to our request listed on appointment (and also pays strict adherence to them ...), that he basically "in easy cases" by does any appointment, for, as Ronsdorf such would lead "to a de facto suspension of the administration of justice" . In fact, this led to two main burst hearings, unnecessary directions from witnesses and a processing delay of one year. VRiLG Böcker has now put to the vote the appointment. Should it come to appeal the trial, it will be at 02 September 2008, held at 10:00 clock (for details, see box at left - dates).

Example 2 - Access to the file: RIAG Ronsdorf had failed to supply the Act only on the local courts at the residence of the defenders for inspection. This led to various difficulties, because such assistance payable once the district court Königstein forgot to inform about this at all, but later was not an insight possible because Judges and judicial secretary in Königstein were negotiating. Later, finished consulting in Koenigstein, made it the justice secretary, from 10 to scan to copy pages from the wrong file 4 pages ... VRiLG Böcker us now the Act has sent directly to our respective application, which in turn contributed to a significant acceleration of the process. That the file was incomplete easily is not nice, now at a strength of over 470 sheets (!) And outstanding second and third acts is not necessarily a complete surprise ...

Example 3 - Zeuginnenabladung: RIAG Ronsdorf had had to load the trial dates in each case witnesses, the "flight services" by Andreas should confirm. To abandon our suggestion, this witnesses as the alleged external affairs was acknowledged Ronsdorf listed on the back of our letter: "No reason." VRiLG Böcker now that the witnesses had initially can be charged, responded to our corresponding excitation , this refrain, directly with the unloading the witnesses.

So it looks at least according to the present state of things as if the proceedings on LG Görlitz carried out with a professionalism that you actually by a court should always expect to, although the AG Zittau was missing completely. However: First, the question remains whether the (blocking) the prosecutor's appeal should be carried out at all, whether or not this is rejected as inadmissible. The request will be published tomorrow here ... .

Need A Slogan For Anorexia And Bulimia

The arrogance of power - will further OLG Dresden stand accused see

"He did not punish, he has no rules of conduct issue, he has to blow not moral, he added, not to understand, and then do the only thing he can people delegate at best: the society protected. "
(Kurt Tucholsky, "Why are actually accused before the judge"; 1927)

OLG Dresden has (by the judges Lips, cousin and Gorial) decided : Who before a judge, the essential elements of law (and prior) in a trial means to the outside can before can sit at the verdict remains, who may to sit longer - in this case two days (or pay 100 EUR).

had now put forward by the Attorney General in their opinion few (apparent) arguments for the defendants standing, we had four or invalidated through . So what sets the OLG Dresden now here to return to the pan? The answer is as simple as regularly: Nothing.

the statement of the GenStA "joins the Senate. You will not be negated by the application by the Attorney General opinion issued on 8 June 2008." content? Arguments? Who needs them when he has the power ...

Need A Slogan For Anorexia And Bulimia

The arrogance of power - will further OLG Dresden stand accused see

"He did not punish, he has no rules of conduct issue, he has to blow not moral, he added, not to understand, and then do the only thing he can people delegate at best: the society protected. "
(Kurt Tucholsky, "Why are actually accused before the judge"; 1927)

OLG Dresden has (by the judges Lips, cousin and Gorial) decided : Who before a judge, the essential elements of law (and prior) in a trial means to the outside can before can sit at the verdict remains, who may to sit longer - in this case two days (or pay 100 EUR).

had now put forward by the Attorney General in their opinion few (apparent) arguments for the defendants standing, we had four or invalidated through . So what sets the OLG Dresden now here to return to the pan? The answer is as simple as regularly: Nothing.

the statement of the GenStA "joins the Senate. You will not be negated by the application by the Attorney General opinion issued on 8 June 2008." content? Arguments? Who needs them when he has the power ...

What Is A Good Ecchi Harem

Saxony Ministry of Justice counter RiStBV - state appeals remains

has now given also the Saxon State Ministry of Justice's opinion in the case of blocking call the StA Görlitz - if one is willing to call the following sentence as an "opinion": "The in its appeal of 29 January 2008 reasons given factual in nature. "

"Material Nature" it is always when the Chief Prosecutor on appeal unconditionally maintained, although the grounds for appeal did not know .

"Material Nature" is a its appeal So even if the people cited " Aggravating circumstances " so (a little) funny, like the refusal of the accused, "to rise in sentencing" or " that the process is used to demonstrate the supposed incompetence and arbitrariness of the trial court ". The prosecutor is it therefore not legally somewhere recognized grounds , but only that it not a defendant, the "silent and sitting in one of the constitutional criteria completely liberated trial (instead of applauding enthusiastically?), on the way to a higher penalty" once "show.

But - in the end it is the prosecution does not even matter. What remains is this: A judge Ronsdorf who takes in rejecting requests to the judge in his own behalf, be illegal (with the collaboration of meeting representative the prosecutor) the defendant cut defense and it later a few minutes - every suspension request abschmetternd - convicted, a prosecutor, a call to prevent the revision lodges and maintained, even though she is not entitled to the RiStBV , finally, a general prosecutor and the Justice Department, to cover this procedure, with here against the same arguments you sit apart no longer. "Rule of Law à la Saxony ...

Now, the district court Görlitz about the further course of events have to decide. For this purpose we will apply until the end of the month accordingly, the appeal be dismissed as inadmissible, because it was filed in abuse of rights is.

What Is A Good Ecchi Harem

Saxony Ministry of Justice counter RiStBV - state appeals remains

has now given also the Saxon State Ministry of Justice's opinion in the case of blocking call the StA Görlitz - if one is willing to call the following sentence as an "opinion": "The in its appeal of 29 January 2008 reasons given factual in nature. "

"Material Nature" it is always when the Chief Prosecutor on appeal unconditionally maintained, although the grounds for appeal did not know .

"Material Nature" is a its appeal So even if the people cited " Aggravating circumstances " so (a little) funny, like the refusal of the accused, "to rise in sentencing" or " that the process is used to demonstrate the supposed incompetence and arbitrariness of the trial court ". The prosecutor is it therefore not legally somewhere recognized grounds , but only that it not a defendant, the "silent and sitting in one of the constitutional criteria completely liberated trial (instead of applauding enthusiastically?), on the way to a higher penalty" once "show.

But - in the end it is the prosecution does not even matter. What remains is this: A judge Ronsdorf who takes in rejecting requests to the judge in his own behalf, be illegal (with the collaboration of meeting representative the prosecutor) the defendant cut defense and it later a few minutes - every suspension request abschmetternd - convicted, a prosecutor, a call to prevent the revision lodges and maintained, even though she is not entitled to the RiStBV , finally, a general prosecutor and the Justice Department, to cover this procedure, with here against the same arguments you sit apart no longer. "Rule of Law à la Saxony ...

Now, the district court Görlitz about the further course of events have to decide. For this purpose we will apply until the end of the month accordingly, the appeal be dismissed as inadmissible, because it was filed in abuse of rights is.

Wild Thornberrys Wildlife Rescue Play Online

The "mere tradition" of standing accused at the sentencing

The Attorney General's Dresden, in her opinion, in which she had requested that the appeal against the imposition of a fine for failure to standing up of the accused to reject the verdict, including a decision of the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart put into play - but unfortunately behind This decision related thoughts's not all. The former Court of Appeal had stated in the mentioned decision: Denied the accused of the direction of the Chairman, to give evidence to stand (...) is not unreasonable then, if this arrangement is not necessary for the proper conduct of the hearing and the defendant is in conveying his refusal not to exceed limits of perception and privilege. Mere tradition in a single court to justify the fixing of an order (...) means not " (NStZ 1986, 233).

These principles are transferred but also on the situation of the seated accused in the verdict: Even for the proper conduct of the hearing is to comply with an order to stand up, any more than necessary, as on other occasions has been traditionally where. If "mere tradition" with a single court setting an order does not justify means, it can also "mere tradition" in many courts - how many there may ultimately be - not to justify the fixing of an order means, "pure tradition" is "mere tradition."

These and other ideas we have noted in our final opinion in the case to the Higher Regional Court of Dresden. There will be no earlier than on 16 Decided in June - remains to be seen whether logic and arguments, or "mere tradition" will be the directing elements of the decision ...

Wild Thornberrys Wildlife Rescue Play Online

The "mere tradition" of standing accused at the sentencing

The Attorney General's Dresden, in her opinion, in which she had requested that the appeal against the imposition of a fine for failure to standing up of the accused to reject the verdict, including a decision of the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart put into play - but unfortunately behind This decision related thoughts's not all. The former Court of Appeal had stated in the mentioned decision: Denied the accused of the direction of the Chairman, to give evidence to stand (...) is not unreasonable then, if this arrangement is not necessary for the proper conduct of the hearing and the defendant is in conveying his refusal not to exceed limits of perception and privilege. Mere tradition in a single court to justify the fixing of an order (...) means not " (NStZ 1986, 233).

These principles are transferred but also on the situation of the seated accused in the verdict: Even for the proper conduct of the hearing is to comply with an order to stand up, any more than necessary, as on other occasions has been traditionally where. If "mere tradition" with a single court setting an order does not justify means, it can also "mere tradition" in many courts - how many there may ultimately be - not to justify the fixing of an order means, "pure tradition" is "mere tradition."

These and other ideas we have noted in our final opinion in the case to the Higher Regional Court of Dresden. There will be no earlier than on 16 Decided in June - remains to be seen whether logic and arguments, or "mere tradition" will be the directing elements of the decision ...

Westjet's Group Rates

The GenStA Dresden, sitting defendant and the "respect"

"A court which is not based on submission, but on a human atmosphere, does not expect any honors. Even with the verdict, the defendant may remain seated. . The defendant is no longer the subject, on the swings, the Court of the Sword "
(Rudolf Wassermann, ZRP 1969, 169, 171)

But , the prosecutor Schreitter-Skvortsov said of the Prosecutor General's Office Dresden: Obviously, the GenStA Dresden is almost 30 years after the water's preoccupation with the theme of "permanent seat defendant" still does not step forward and says The defendant is the subject, on which the Court of the sword swings.

ignored in their opinion for immediate appeal against the fine on charges of "suspension" by the verdict, the prosecutor pretty much everything that was presented in the statement of grounds on the subject - precisely the kind of - arguments not observed - opinion as we in his time as a blog entry only way to sanction (without argument) to "defend", have shown. The GenStA is not even too good to recite the "argument" of "respect," which has just been exposed in the grounds of appeal as unfounded sense across pages and perfect.

before special Background of on 14.12.07, held the trial, a trial whose style the totalitarian corresponded systems and was not painted in the mixture rule of law, the GenStA is still one on top: "The story of the trial is not in any event, the seat stay while to justify the verdict. "

we formulate this once more clearly to make it clear what the GenStA here claimed officially If a court in a trial to the accused, the defense surprising and unlawful (this is now by the LG found been !) withdraws then does not allow any interruption and the accused in a kind of summary proceedings in a legal vacuum then convicted - all this does not alter the fact that the accused in the verdict this, pay is apparently not in law bound sentient court "respect" by rising - and if the accused does not, then it is only fair to require the defendants therefor a fine or, failing that, to imprison him for this behavior for two days.

That such a view can not be found in Berlin in 1935, Rostock Stuttgart in 1955 or 1975, but in Dresden 2008 - you have to cope with the first one ...

Westjet's Group Rates

The GenStA Dresden, sitting defendant and the "respect"

"A court which is not based on submission, but on a human atmosphere, does not expect any honors. Even with the verdict, the defendant may remain seated. . The defendant is no longer the subject, on the swings, the Court of the Sword "
(Rudolf Wassermann, ZRP 1969, 169, 171)

But , the prosecutor Schreitter-Skvortsov said of the Prosecutor General's Office Dresden: Obviously, the GenStA Dresden is almost 30 years after the water's preoccupation with the theme of "permanent seat defendant" still does not step forward and says The defendant is the subject, on which the Court of the sword swings.

ignored in their opinion for immediate appeal against the fine on charges of "suspension" by the verdict, the prosecutor pretty much everything that was presented in the statement of grounds on the subject - precisely the kind of - arguments not observed - opinion as we in his time as a blog entry only way to sanction (without argument) to "defend", have shown. The GenStA is not even too good to recite the "argument" of "respect," which has just been exposed in the grounds of appeal as unfounded sense across pages and perfect.

before special Background of on 14.12.07, held the trial, a trial whose style the totalitarian corresponded systems and was not painted in the mixture rule of law, the GenStA is still one on top: "The story of the trial is not in any event, the seat stay while to justify the verdict. "

we formulate this once more clearly to make it clear what the GenStA here claimed officially If a court in a trial to the accused, the defense surprising and unlawful (this is now by the LG found been !) withdraws then does not allow any interruption and the accused in a kind of summary proceedings in a legal vacuum then convicted - all this does not alter the fact that the accused in the verdict this, pay is apparently not in law bound sentient court "respect" by rising - and if the accused does not, then it is only fair to require the defendants therefor a fine or, failing that, to imprison him for this behavior for two days.

That such a view can not be found in Berlin in 1935, Rostock Stuttgart in 1955 or 1975, but in Dresden 2008 - you have to cope with the first one ...