"He did not punish, he has no rules of conduct issue, he has to blow not moral, he added, not to understand, and then do the only thing he can people delegate at best: the society protected. "
(Kurt Tucholsky, "Why are actually accused before the judge"; 1927)
OLG Dresden has (by the judges Lips, cousin and Gorial) decided : Who before a judge, the essential elements of law (and prior) in a trial means to the outside can before can sit at the verdict remains, who may to sit longer - in this case two days (or pay 100 EUR).
had now put forward by the Attorney General in their opinion few (apparent) arguments for the defendants standing, we had four or invalidated through . So what sets the OLG Dresden now here to return to the pan? The answer is as simple as regularly: Nothing.
the statement of the GenStA "joins the Senate. You will not be negated by the application by the Attorney General opinion issued on 8 June 2008." content? Arguments? Who needs them when he has the power ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment