Need A Slogan For Anorexia And Bulimia

The arrogance of power - will further OLG Dresden stand accused see

"He did not punish, he has no rules of conduct issue, he has to blow not moral, he added, not to understand, and then do the only thing he can people delegate at best: the society protected. "
(Kurt Tucholsky, "Why are actually accused before the judge"; 1927)

OLG Dresden has (by the judges Lips, cousin and Gorial) decided : Who before a judge, the essential elements of law (and prior) in a trial means to the outside can before can sit at the verdict remains, who may to sit longer - in this case two days (or pay 100 EUR).

had now put forward by the Attorney General in their opinion few (apparent) arguments for the defendants standing, we had four or invalidated through . So what sets the OLG Dresden now here to return to the pan? The answer is as simple as regularly: Nothing.

the statement of the GenStA "joins the Senate. You will not be negated by the application by the Attorney General opinion issued on 8 June 2008." content? Arguments? Who needs them when he has the power ...

Need A Slogan For Anorexia And Bulimia

The arrogance of power - will further OLG Dresden stand accused see

"He did not punish, he has no rules of conduct issue, he has to blow not moral, he added, not to understand, and then do the only thing he can people delegate at best: the society protected. "
(Kurt Tucholsky, "Why are actually accused before the judge"; 1927)

OLG Dresden has (by the judges Lips, cousin and Gorial) decided : Who before a judge, the essential elements of law (and prior) in a trial means to the outside can before can sit at the verdict remains, who may to sit longer - in this case two days (or pay 100 EUR).

had now put forward by the Attorney General in their opinion few (apparent) arguments for the defendants standing, we had four or invalidated through . So what sets the OLG Dresden now here to return to the pan? The answer is as simple as regularly: Nothing.

the statement of the GenStA "joins the Senate. You will not be negated by the application by the Attorney General opinion issued on 8 June 2008." content? Arguments? Who needs them when he has the power ...

What Is A Good Ecchi Harem

Saxony Ministry of Justice counter RiStBV - state appeals remains

has now given also the Saxon State Ministry of Justice's opinion in the case of blocking call the StA Görlitz - if one is willing to call the following sentence as an "opinion": "The in its appeal of 29 January 2008 reasons given factual in nature. "

"Material Nature" it is always when the Chief Prosecutor on appeal unconditionally maintained, although the grounds for appeal did not know .

"Material Nature" is a its appeal So even if the people cited " Aggravating circumstances " so (a little) funny, like the refusal of the accused, "to rise in sentencing" or " that the process is used to demonstrate the supposed incompetence and arbitrariness of the trial court ". The prosecutor is it therefore not legally somewhere recognized grounds , but only that it not a defendant, the "silent and sitting in one of the constitutional criteria completely liberated trial (instead of applauding enthusiastically?), on the way to a higher penalty" once "show.

But - in the end it is the prosecution does not even matter. What remains is this: A judge Ronsdorf who takes in rejecting requests to the judge in his own behalf, be illegal (with the collaboration of meeting representative the prosecutor) the defendant cut defense and it later a few minutes - every suspension request abschmetternd - convicted, a prosecutor, a call to prevent the revision lodges and maintained, even though she is not entitled to the RiStBV , finally, a general prosecutor and the Justice Department, to cover this procedure, with here against the same arguments you sit apart no longer. "Rule of Law à la Saxony ...

Now, the district court Görlitz about the further course of events have to decide. For this purpose we will apply until the end of the month accordingly, the appeal be dismissed as inadmissible, because it was filed in abuse of rights is.

What Is A Good Ecchi Harem

Saxony Ministry of Justice counter RiStBV - state appeals remains

has now given also the Saxon State Ministry of Justice's opinion in the case of blocking call the StA Görlitz - if one is willing to call the following sentence as an "opinion": "The in its appeal of 29 January 2008 reasons given factual in nature. "

"Material Nature" it is always when the Chief Prosecutor on appeal unconditionally maintained, although the grounds for appeal did not know .

"Material Nature" is a its appeal So even if the people cited " Aggravating circumstances " so (a little) funny, like the refusal of the accused, "to rise in sentencing" or " that the process is used to demonstrate the supposed incompetence and arbitrariness of the trial court ". The prosecutor is it therefore not legally somewhere recognized grounds , but only that it not a defendant, the "silent and sitting in one of the constitutional criteria completely liberated trial (instead of applauding enthusiastically?), on the way to a higher penalty" once "show.

But - in the end it is the prosecution does not even matter. What remains is this: A judge Ronsdorf who takes in rejecting requests to the judge in his own behalf, be illegal (with the collaboration of meeting representative the prosecutor) the defendant cut defense and it later a few minutes - every suspension request abschmetternd - convicted, a prosecutor, a call to prevent the revision lodges and maintained, even though she is not entitled to the RiStBV , finally, a general prosecutor and the Justice Department, to cover this procedure, with here against the same arguments you sit apart no longer. "Rule of Law à la Saxony ...

Now, the district court Görlitz about the further course of events have to decide. For this purpose we will apply until the end of the month accordingly, the appeal be dismissed as inadmissible, because it was filed in abuse of rights is.

Wild Thornberrys Wildlife Rescue Play Online

The "mere tradition" of standing accused at the sentencing

The Attorney General's Dresden, in her opinion, in which she had requested that the appeal against the imposition of a fine for failure to standing up of the accused to reject the verdict, including a decision of the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart put into play - but unfortunately behind This decision related thoughts's not all. The former Court of Appeal had stated in the mentioned decision: Denied the accused of the direction of the Chairman, to give evidence to stand (...) is not unreasonable then, if this arrangement is not necessary for the proper conduct of the hearing and the defendant is in conveying his refusal not to exceed limits of perception and privilege. Mere tradition in a single court to justify the fixing of an order (...) means not " (NStZ 1986, 233).

These principles are transferred but also on the situation of the seated accused in the verdict: Even for the proper conduct of the hearing is to comply with an order to stand up, any more than necessary, as on other occasions has been traditionally where. If "mere tradition" with a single court setting an order does not justify means, it can also "mere tradition" in many courts - how many there may ultimately be - not to justify the fixing of an order means, "pure tradition" is "mere tradition."

These and other ideas we have noted in our final opinion in the case to the Higher Regional Court of Dresden. There will be no earlier than on 16 Decided in June - remains to be seen whether logic and arguments, or "mere tradition" will be the directing elements of the decision ...

Wild Thornberrys Wildlife Rescue Play Online

The "mere tradition" of standing accused at the sentencing

The Attorney General's Dresden, in her opinion, in which she had requested that the appeal against the imposition of a fine for failure to standing up of the accused to reject the verdict, including a decision of the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart put into play - but unfortunately behind This decision related thoughts's not all. The former Court of Appeal had stated in the mentioned decision: Denied the accused of the direction of the Chairman, to give evidence to stand (...) is not unreasonable then, if this arrangement is not necessary for the proper conduct of the hearing and the defendant is in conveying his refusal not to exceed limits of perception and privilege. Mere tradition in a single court to justify the fixing of an order (...) means not " (NStZ 1986, 233).

These principles are transferred but also on the situation of the seated accused in the verdict: Even for the proper conduct of the hearing is to comply with an order to stand up, any more than necessary, as on other occasions has been traditionally where. If "mere tradition" with a single court setting an order does not justify means, it can also "mere tradition" in many courts - how many there may ultimately be - not to justify the fixing of an order means, "pure tradition" is "mere tradition."

These and other ideas we have noted in our final opinion in the case to the Higher Regional Court of Dresden. There will be no earlier than on 16 Decided in June - remains to be seen whether logic and arguments, or "mere tradition" will be the directing elements of the decision ...