RIAG Ronsdorf and no end - rejection in the cost of
"The fee does not apply to withdrawal of the appeal before the expiry of the term justification." This is what No 3131 of costs directory of legal costs law. Is indeed not very difficult interpretierungsbedürftig the sentence.
have it now but managed only three people - two officials from the district attorney costs Görlitz and now also the District Auditor on LG Görlitz In his opinion - ignore this simple sentence. As described in the last posting, we need to experience that on a regular basis despite withdrawal of the appeal before the expiry of the period Justification an illegal fee under the 3130 or 3131 points will be set. In all cases where we were but were confronted with could be the prosecutor in the end persuaded that the cause in each case but was quite simple and here there is no room for interpretation.
Not so, however, in Görlitz. And now this question is actually the AG Zittau for decision. And who is responsible ? Once again, the judge of the District Court Ronsdorf that the underlying criminal proceedings "in charge" already on his very special way.
We remember that the last contact of the defendant, Andreas Reuter, with RIAG Ronsdorf was held on 14.12.2007 - on this day Ronsdorf escaped in a "coup" to be named the overall defense authorization act (the later by the LG Görlitz was re-issued), prevented any kind of suspension or even break and sentenced the defendant a few minutes later. The "law" was absent, the whole operation felt bad in black and white. The prosecution presented to prevent an appeal on their part an appeal, since "an appeal of the prosecution could have intended to protect the magistrate" !
Well, then again Ronsdorf. And of course the re rejection of it. In the previous challenge procedure, there was the whole team at AG Zittau very resistant to the law on "suspicion of partiality," the recent rejection of the request completed the challenged judge Ronsdorf equal itself, in which he (apparently illegal already, as go into the substantive analysis ) as inadmissible and therefore qualified to judge and made things.
is now the District Court again on the course, first RIAG Ronsdorf is his official opinion from leave. Since we are curious ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment