When Andrew in December 2007 after a hearing, the rule of law principles, scoffed at the announcement of the appeal did not raise, grabbed judge Ronsdorf still one on top : 100 EUR administrative fine, failing that, two days in jail.
Andreas did not pay, but sat . And now got a week ago, a bill - a detention fee of 24.88 EUR. Alone - there is no legal basis for the imposition of a detention costs contribution. After all, who does not required to work is (§ 175 of the Prison Act - "- way, safety, forced and forcing enforcement of of order" in the section), does not pay ( § 50 para 1 sentence 2 No. 3 Prison Act ) .
After it has now been tried so illegally, 240 EUR recover in time for a revision withdrawn, we are with this detention fee calculation in the second cost method. Against this bill, we have the appeal of memory inserted .
it is exciting that again does not correct the prosecutor and decide their own incorrect billing the district court must (as in the auditing costs thing) or whether it is a bit easier this time. The case should go back to the AG Zittau for decision, it would then probably again RIAG Ronsdorf of it - really - would have to decide, however, the challenge procedure complaint was still pending against him from LG Görlitz.
0 comments:
Post a Comment