After the prosecution after ten months of struggle, the obscure - obviously - had levied improper audit fee last month withdrawn, we still had a small account of the other way open. Officers and legal costs that carers make such errors and their love of time, this view then, is already far from beautiful. But if the District Auditor pass such a wrong decision not only can, but also at (perverse) Reference commentaries still thinks they have to defend, then the matter is something fishy. The man, so you just have to attest to, is apparently not up to his job (or, as far as we want to go but has not, here in bold intent to tell the horse). So be it - we want to change that. Since the cost method was ultimately resolved over the phone, we never had the opportunity to respond to the then opinion of the District Auditor.
we have now remedied this in a personal letter to Mr. Ulrich Reimann. There We have once again combined the absurdities of his "argument". Did he at that time seriously, he can at least learn. Our request to respond to the letter, at least in any way, even if we are not in the official proceedings, Mr. Reimann is in the last two weeks, however, remained unmet. Otherwise, like the letter, at least - provided sufficient humor - the respected audience used to fall to the daring demonstration of the District Auditor to smile.
0 comments:
Post a Comment